CULTURA
Gibney Says Universal 'Wavered' on Musk Film After Venice Premiere
The director's four-hour documentary drew insults from Musk after its Venice debut, and its distributor hesitated, the Guardian reports.
Eleonora Vanzetti430 wordsEdition №147Wednesday, 14 October 2026 — Edition № 147
Alex Gibney, director of a new four-hour documentary about Elon Musk, has said that Universal, which holds the film's international distribution rights, "wavered" over releasing it, according to the Guardian. The revelation follows the film's premiere at the Venice Film Festival, which the Guardian reports drew a string of criticisms and insults from Musk, the founder of SpaceXAI.
The episode places Venice once again at the centre of a dispute that extends well beyond the Lido. The festival has in recent years become a stage where films about powerful technology figures premiere before a global press corps, and where the subjects of those films can respond in public within hours.
Gibney is an established American documentary maker whose work has often examined corporate and political power. That a major studio's international arm would hesitate over a completed film is the kind of detail that travels quickly through the festival circuit, where distributors, sales agents and programmers watch one another's decisions closely.
The Guardian's report frames the hesitation as a commercial question rather than a political one, though the two are difficult to separate in this case. Universal's international distribution arm is the subject of Gibney's remark, not the studio's domestic operation, and the Guardian does not state what specific concerns were raised or by whom. What the paper does report is that the film's Venice reception, including Musk's own public criticism, preceded that hesitation.
Venice has a long record of premiering documentaries and dramas that courts controversy before reaching general audiences. In recent years the festival's programme has included films about surveillance, platform economics and the personal lives of technology executives, and the resulting press cycles have often shaped how those films are sold abroad. For Italian audiences, the practical consequence is usually a delay: films that open in Venice in late summer frequently reach Italian cinemas months later, if at all, depending on how international rights are handled.
The cultural economy around the festival is not incidental to this story. Venice's market and its press screenings function as a first test of whether a contentious film can be marketed without its subject's cooperation, and distributors watch those signals when setting release dates. The Guardian's account does not say whether a release date has been set or whether the film will reach European cinemas on the original schedule.
Gibney's previous documentaries have been distributed widely in Europe, and his name carries weight with festival programmers and art-house exhibitors. That audience is precisely the one most likely to be affected if a release is delayed or narrowed. The Guardian's report leaves the outcome open, and neither Universal nor Gibney is quoted offering a timetable.
