CALABRIA
Italy Still Draws Millionaires Despite 50 Percent Flat Tax Rise
A new report finds Italy remains one of Europe's leading destinations for wealthy relocants even after the government raised its flat tax on new residents.
Saverio Gallo470 wordsEdition №138Thursday, 8 October 2026 — Edition № 138
Italy remains one of Europe's most attractive destinations for millionaires, according to a new report cited by The Local Italy, even after the government raised its flat tax on wealthy new residents by 50 percent this year. The finding suggests that the tax regime, introduced to pull high-net-worth individuals south, retains its pull even as Rome asks more of those who use it.
The flat tax is a fixed annual levy on foreign income for people who transfer their tax residence to Italy. It has been the centrepiece of a deliberate effort to attract wealthy arrivals, and the report's verdict is that the increase has not broken the model. The Local Italy reported the finding without naming the authors of the study or giving a figure for how many millionaires relocated in 2026.
The report, as The Local Italy describes it, places Italy at the top of the list of European countries drawing millionaire relocations this year. That is a notable result for a government that has simultaneously tightened the terms of the scheme: raising the annual charge by half is a substantial increase, and the fear among its designers would have been that the wealthy would simply choose another jurisdiction. According to the outlet's account, they have not, at least not yet.
The flat tax has always been a contested instrument. Its defenders present it as a cheap way to import spending power, philanthropy and business activity; its critics argue it lets the very wealthy buy their way out of the progressive system that everyone else pays into. The report cited by The Local Italy does not resolve that argument. It only records that, on the evidence of 2026 relocations, the demand side has absorbed the higher price.
The distinction between millionaires who move their tax residence and the wider question of foreign residents is worth keeping clear. The same outlet has reported separately that would-be residents from countries such as the United States are holding off on moving to Italy, citing tax obligations, healthcare and political uncertainty. Those are different populations with different thresholds: one is choosing between tax regimes, the other is deciding whether an ordinary life in Italy is worth the paperwork and the cost.
For the south, the flat tax has never been the main story. The scheme's beneficiaries cluster in Milan, Rome, Florence and the lakes, where the infrastructure and services they expect already exist. A region such as Calabria competes for a different kind of arrival, and for different reasons. The report cited by The Local Italy does not claim any southern benefit from the millionaire inflow, and none should be assumed.
What the finding does establish is that Italy's fiscal offer to the wealthy is still working as designed, even at a higher price. Whether that is good policy is a separate question the report does not answer. What it shows is that the government has room to charge more without losing the clientele, at least for now.
