LAZIO
Lazio Women ordered to pay damages in pregnancy dismissal ruling
Court of Arbitration for Sport upholds FifPro complaint, marking a watershed moment for maternal rights in professional football.
Davide Ruspoli370 wordsEdition №31Tuesday, 30 June 2026 — Edition № 31

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has ruled in favour of Swedish midfielder Maja Gothberg in her case against Lazio Women, finding that the Roman club unlawfully ended her employment due to pregnancy. According to the BBC and AP News, Gothberg brought the complaint through FifPro, the global players' union, which called the ruling a "groundbreaking" decision for maternal rights in professional football. The compensation order marks a rare instance of a top-tier European football institution held accountable for pregnancy discrimination.
The case centred on the contract termination following Gothberg's pregnancy announcement. Lazio Women's decision to end her employment triggered the complaint to CAS, which adjudicates disputes in international sport. The union's characterisation of the ruling as groundbreaking reflects the rarity of such victories: pregnancy discrimination in professional football remains widespread, with players often facing pressure to terminate contracts or accept reduced terms when expecting. The decision establishes a precedent that may embolden other players to challenge similar dismissals.
For Lazio Women, the ruling carries institutional and financial consequences. The club, based in Rome and part of the broader Lazio football structure, now faces not only the compensation obligation but also reputational damage at a moment when women's football in Italy is gaining visibility and investment. The decision also signals to other Italian clubs that CAS will scrutinise employment practices against international labour and discrimination standards, regardless of local norms or football's traditionally permissive culture around such matters.
FifPro's framing of the decision as a watershed moment reflects the union's broader campaign to enforce maternity protections across professional football. Most major leagues lack explicit maternity provisions, leaving pregnant players vulnerable to contract termination, reduced pay, or forced leave without protection. The CAS ruling, by treating pregnancy-related dismissal as unlawful regardless of Italian domestic law, establishes an international standard that unions can invoke in future cases. This approach bypasses the inconsistency of national employment law and appeals to the court's authority over international sport.
The timing matters for Italian women's football, which has expanded significantly in recent years with increased investment, media coverage, and participation. Lazio Women competes in Serie A Femminile, Italy's top division, alongside clubs like Juventus and AS Roma Women. A ruling against a major club on discrimination grounds raises the profile of player protections and may prompt Italian clubs to review their maternity policies proactively. The decision also aligns with broader EU employment law, which mandates maternity protections; CAS's ruling reinforces that international football cannot operate outside those standards.
