TOSCANA
Max Mara's Quiet Milan Show, and the Tuscan Workshops That Would Make It
The Guardian finds no shock value on the Milan catwalk — coats, boots and suede bags, the sort of goods the Arno valley still cuts and stitches
Costanza Bardi520 wordsEdition №126Friday, 25 September 2026 — Edition № 126
Max Mara's show at Milan fashion week offered well-cut coats, sturdy block-heeled boots, crisp white shirts and capacious suede handbags, according to the Guardian's fashion desk, which noted what the collection deliberately did not have: shock value. The report describes the house's theme as the "nonconformist glamour" of Amelia Earhart and other pioneers — chore jackets and loose-fit trousers among the pieces.
The Guardian's account is a useful corrective to the idea that Milan week runs on provocation. A collection built on outerwear, boots and leather bags is a collection built on the categories in which Italian manufacturing is genuinely competitive, and which foreign buyers assess on cut and material rather than on spectacle.
Tuscany's stake in that is old and specific. The region's leather and footwear districts have supplied the luxury houses for decades, and the suede handbag on a Milan runway is the visible end of a supply chain that runs through the Arno valley.
The Guardian's reviewer was struck by the collection's restraint, describing coats, block-heeled boots, white shirts and large suede bags, and the pioneer motif that gave the clothes their rationale. The piece quotes the house's creative direction on the theme of audacious women, and frames the whole as glamour without gimmick. That is a commercial posture as much as an aesthetic one: outerwear and leather goods are the reliable margin, season after season, for a luxury group.
For Tuscany, the relevant fact is structural rather than new. The region's leather and footwear clusters — around Florence, Santa Croce sull'Arno and the Valdarno — have long worked as suppliers and contractors for Italian and foreign luxury brands, cutting, stitching and finishing goods that reach the catwalk under someone else's label. The Guardian's description of sturdy boots and capacious suede bags names exactly the objects those workshops know how to make.
It does not follow that a good Milan season is a good Tuscan season. The wire does not say where Max Mara's goods are produced, and the relationship between a runway moment and a workshop order book is indirect, lagged and mediated by sourcing decisions made elsewhere. What can be said is that the categories the Guardian praises are the categories in which Tuscan manufacturing has accumulated real skill, and that the region's exposure to fashion is therefore a manufacturing exposure as much as a retail one.
That distinction matters when the foreign press writes about Italian fashion as a Milan or Paris story. The image is made in the show; the object is made somewhere else, often in a Tuscan town that no fashion-week dispatch will name. The Guardian's review is a fair record of what was on the catwalk. The region's interest is in what has to be cut and sewn before anything gets there, and in whether the next generation of workers is still being trained to do it.
