The newspaper of Italy, seen from abroad
La Veduta — giornale di idee, cultura e affari
Inaugural Edition № 1
Back to the edition

OPINION

The Bull, Diminished: A Small Scandal With a Long Shadow

Editorial Board419 wordsEdition2Tuesday, 2 June 2026 — Edition № 2

The Guardian broke the story on Monday, and the BBC confirmed it the same afternoon: a restoration of the famous Rampant Bull mosaic in Milan's nineteenth-century Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II has, in the course of repairing damage caused by decades of pirouetting tourists, apparently erased the anatomical detail that gave the tradition its meaning. The bull has been, as critics put it with considerable relish, castrated. We record this with the seriousness it deserves, which is to say: not very much, and yet rather more than it first appears.

The immediate comedy is plain. A mosaic worn smooth by visitors seeking good luck through an act of ritual contact with a bull's most emphatic feature has been restored in such a way that the feature is no longer clearly present. The Guardian reported the mockery; the BBC reported the bemusement. Both outlets treated the episode as a light human-interest story, and in one register it is exactly that. But we have been in this business long enough to know that Italy's heritage disasters — and this is a minor one, mercifully — tend to arrive wrapped in laughter before the reckoning comes.

The deeper issue is one the international press has returned to repeatedly, though rarely in connection with floor mosaics: the strain that mass tourism places on the fabric of Italian cities. The Guardian had, just days earlier, reported on the same Galleria in a different register, describing the restoration project as a response to wear caused by the very visitors who sustain the city's economy. There is a circularity here that ought to trouble municipal authorities more than it apparently does. The tourists come because the monument exists; the monument is damaged because the tourists come; the restoration, rushed or underfunded or simply careless, produces a result that generates fresh mockery, which generates fresh attention, which brings more tourists.

We do not know who commissioned the restoration, who carried it out, or whether the missing detail will be corrected. We do not have that information from the international wire, and we will not invent it. What we do know, from the coverage before us, is that the world found the story irresistible — and that Italy's heritage is, in the foreign press, perpetually caught between reverence and ridicule. The Rampant Bull deserved better. So, we would argue, does the broader conversation about what it costs to maintain a country that the world treats as its collective inheritance while leaving the bills, and the restorations, to the Italians.

Share