The newspaper of Italy, seen from abroad
La Veduta — giornale di idee, cultura e affari
Inaugural Edition № 1
World wire
…
← Back to the edition

OPINION

The Vote and the Vineyard: Two Italies in One Week

Editorial Board388 wordsEdition №140Saturday, 10 October 2026 — Edition № 140

The foreign wires this week carried two stories from Italy that sat oddly together. The BBC and the Guardian reported that Parliament had approved an overhaul of the electoral law, with the opposition calling it a 'scam' and vowing to challenge it in court; the reform grants an extra reward of seats to any bloc reaching 42 per cent of the vote. On the same days, the Guardian, the BBC, the New York Times and France 24 all covered the theft of some 30,000 bottles — valued at about €5m — from the cellars of the Marchesi Antinori winery near Cortona. One story was about how power is won; the other about what Italy is known for abroad. The second travelled further.

It is worth pausing on that imbalance. A constitutional argument over representation, conducted by secret ballot according to the Guardian's account, is the sort of story that shapes a country for a generation. A wine heist, however brazen, is a curiosity. Yet the heist was reported on four continents within a day, while the electoral law was covered mainly by the British press and the specialist Italy desks. The world, it seems, has a settled idea of what Italy is for, and it is not the machinery of its democracy.

This is the frame we live inside. Foreign coverage returns again and again to the same subjects — food, wine, landscape, craft, the beauty of things made slowly and well — and treats the political life of the country as a background hum, faintly comic, largely illegible. That framing is not malicious. It is simply easier. A cellar in Tuscany requires no translation. A bonus-seat threshold and its effect on the next election requires a great deal.

We do not write this to scold our foreign colleagues, whose reporting on both stories was careful. We write it because the asymmetry has consequences. When a country is admired chiefly for what it produces, its arguments about how it governs itself are heard as noise. The opposition's claim that the new law distorts representation, whatever its merits, will struggle to reach readers who know Italy only as a place of vineyards and centenarians. The vineyard, this week, got the wider audience. The vote got the narrower one. That, more than any single reform, is the condition worth noticing.

Share