TOSCANA
Italy Still Draws Millionaires Even as Flat Tax Rises
A new report finds Italy remains among Europe's top destinations for wealthy relocators, despite a 50 percent increase in the flat tax for new residents.
Costanza Bardi520 wordsEdition №138Thursday, 8 October 2026 — Edition № 138
Italy remains one of Europe's most attractive destinations for millionaires, according to a new report cited by The Local Italy, even after the government raised its flat tax on wealthy new residents by 50 percent this year. The finding suggests that the fiscal incentive is only one of several reasons the wealthy choose Italy, and not necessarily the decisive one.
The flat tax regime, long marketed to high-net-worth individuals considering a move, was designed to draw foreign capital and spending into the Italian economy. Its increase this year was widely read as a signal that the government wanted a larger share of that inflow. The new report indicates the deterrent effect has been smaller than critics predicted.
For Tuscany, the question is what kind of wealth arrives and where it settles. The region's hills have drawn foreign buyers for decades, and the report's finding will be read in Florence and Siena as confirmation that the demand for Tuscan property is not solely tax-driven.
The flat tax for new residents is a national measure, and the report cited by The Local Italy does not break down where relocating millionaires choose to live. That omission matters for Tuscany, which competes with Milan, Rome and the lakes for the same pool of wealthy arrivals. The region's appeal rests on heritage, landscape and the established foreign community in and around Florence, factors a tax change does not touch directly.
What the report does support is a modest conclusion: the tax rise has not reversed Italy's position as a leading European destination for millionaire migration. The Local frames the finding as a surprise against the expectation that a 50 percent increase would cool demand. Beyond that, the report offers no regional figures, no breakdown by nationality, and no detail on how many of those relocating choose Tuscany over other regions.
The distinction between the marketed idyll and working Tuscany is relevant here. Wealthy arrivals tend to concentrate in the historic centres and the postcard countryside, where property prices are already under pressure from tourism and short-term rentals. The same housing squeeze that The Local Italy reported this week as a national budget concern is felt acutely in Florence, where residents have been priced out of central neighbourhoods. Whether an influx of millionaires eases or sharpens that pressure is not addressed by the report.
The report's timing is notable. It lands in the same week that The Local Italy reported would-be foreign residents are holding off on moving to Italy, citing taxes and healthcare. The two stories are not contradictory: the millionaire flat-tax regime and the ordinary relocation decision are different calculations, governed by different thresholds. But read together, they suggest Italy's appeal to foreign incomers is becoming more stratified, with the very wealthy undeterred and the merely comfortable more cautious.
For the Tuscan bureau, the practical question is whether the region can convert wealthy arrivals into something more durable than seasonal occupancy. The report does not answer that. It confirms only that the flow continues, and that the fiscal lever the government pulled this year has not, on this evidence, stopped it.
