FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA
Ukrainian Children in Italian Care Weigh a Future in the EU
A Guardian investigation follows evacuees placed in Alpine villages who resist Kyiv's call to return, raising questions for Italy's eastern border regions
Sergio Madrussan640 wordsEdition №121Sunday, 20 September 2026 — Edition № 121
When Russia's full-scale invasion began in 2022, thousands of Ukrainian children in state care were evacuated westward, and a share of them were placed in Italy, including in small villages in the Italian Alps. The Guardian reported this week that many of those children now resist returning to Ukraine, even as Kyiv presses for their repatriation. The paper followed the case of Denys, a 15-year-old who arrived in an Alpine village in March 2022 after an overnight bus journey and, by his own account, felt homesick and confused at first.
The story is a human one, but it also describes an administrative problem that European states have not resolved: who has authority over a minor evacuated from a war zone, and what 'the child's best interest' means when the child has now spent more than four years in a European school and speaks a European language. According to the Guardian, Kyiv wants the children back; many of them do not want to go.
The Guardian's reporting places the Italian placements within a wider European picture, noting that thousands of children in Ukrainian state care were evacuated when Russia invaded and were distributed among host countries. Italy is one of those hosts, though the Guardian does not give a figure for how many children were placed on Italian soil, and no reliable Italian breakdown is available from the foreign coverage. What the paper does establish is the pattern: children placed in ordinary communities, enrolled in local schools, and left in a legal grey zone as the war has lengthened.
The Italian placements described in the Guardian's piece are in the Alps, not in Friuli-Venezia Giulia. The bureau notes this plainly: the wire does not name this region, and we will not manufacture a local caseload, a local authority or a local dispute that the reporting does not contain. The relevance to Italy's eastern edge is structural rather than anecdotal. Friuli-Venezia Giulia is the country's principal land gateway to the east, and the region's schools and social services have absorbed successive waves of arrivals over the past decade, from the Balkan route and, since 2022, from Ukraine. The administrative questions the Guardian raises — guardianship, consent, the standing of a child's own stated preference — are the same questions that any Italian region hosting unaccompanied or separated minors has to answer.
The Guardian frames the tension as one between a state's legitimate interest in its own children and a child's expressed wish to remain in the EU. That framing is not unique to Ukraine. Italy has faced comparable arguments in other contexts, and the wire does not suggest Rome has taken a formal position on the Ukrainian cases the paper describes. Readers should treat the numbers in the Guardian's account as the paper's own reporting rather than a settled European statistic; the Guardian itself does not provide a comprehensive count for Italy.
What the story does establish is that the arrangement is now long enough to have produced a generation of minors whose legal status and personal preference point in different directions. The Guardian reports that Kyiv wants them returned and that many resist. How European host states, including Italy, resolve that conflict — and whether they treat the child's preference as decisive — remains open. The paper's reporting is the fullest available account in the international press, and it does not yet describe a resolution.
