CULTURA
Venice Biennale faces artists' legal threat over voting system
More than 100 participants demand removal from visitor ballot as jury-less awards model draws fire
Eleonora Vanzetti1,487 wordsEdition №6Saturday, 6 June 2026 — Edition № 6

More than 100 artists participating in the Venice Biennale have threatened legal action against the show's organisers over a dispute centred on visitor-voted awards, according to The Art Newspaper. In a statement posted on 3 June, artists from the Biennale's In Minor Keys exhibition and various national pavilions said they were disappointed that the Biennale had failed to act on repeated requests to remove them from the ballot. The dispute marks the most chaotic and contested edition of the Biennale in recent memory, AP News reported.
The controversy stems from the Biennale's decision to abandon its traditional jury system for awarding the prestigious Golden Lions and instead allow visitors to vote for the best national pavilion and overall participants. Artists have objected to being included in this ballot without their consent, raising questions about the legitimacy of the awards process. The voting model, introduced this year, was meant to democratise the selection process but has instead created a legal and ethical minefield for the institution.
The timing of the artists' action coincides with other tensions at the 2026 edition. Pussy Riot and FEMEN activists have protested Russia's return to the Biennale following its absence after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, according to Newser. The convergence of these disputes—over governance, consent, and geopolitics—has transformed what was meant to be a celebration of contemporary art into a battleground over the Biennale's role and values.
